South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley has announced his opposition to the attempt to move a lawsuit against the NCAA to federal court. The lawsuit, filed by South Dakota residents in 2014, accuses the NCAA of antitrust violations over its rules restricting the compensation of college athletes.
Jackley argues that the lawsuit should remain in state court, as the case involves state antitrust laws and does not meet the criteria for federal jurisdiction. He emphasizes that the state court is the appropriate venue for the lawsuit, as South Dakota residents are the plaintiffs and the NCAA is a defendant.
The NCAA, on the other hand, has requested that the case be moved to federal court, citing the need for a consistent national standard in antitrust cases involving college athletics. The NCAA argues that a federal court would be better equipped to handle the complex legal issues involved in the case.
Jackley’s opposition to the NCAA’s request reflects his commitment to ensuring that South Dakota residents have their day in court and that the case is decided based on state antitrust laws. He believes that the state court is the best forum for resolving the lawsuit and that moving it to federal court would only serve to delay the proceedings.
The lawsuit against the NCAA has been closely watched by college sports fans and legal experts alike, as it could have far-reaching implications for the regulation of college athletics. Jackley’s stance on the case reinforces his dedication to upholding state laws and protecting the rights of South Dakota residents in legal matters.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com