Landowners in South Dakota are at odds with the state legislature over the proposed Summit carbon pipeline. The pipeline, which would transport carbon dioxide captured from ethanol plants to underground storage sites in North Dakota, has faced opposition from landowners who are concerned about the potential environmental impact and loss of land rights.
The South Dakota House of Representatives recently passed a bill that would allow the pipeline company to use eminent domain to acquire land for the project. Eminent domain is the legal right of the government or its agents to expropriate private property for public use, with compensation to the owner.
Opponents of the bill argue that the pipeline is not a public use project and therefore should not be granted the power of eminent domain. They also claim that the pipeline could have negative effects on the environment, including potential leaks and contamination of water sources.
Supporters of the pipeline, including the ethanol industry, argue that the project is necessary to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and support the transition to cleaner energy sources. They also claim that the pipeline will bring economic benefits to the state.
The issue has sparked heated debate in the state, with both sides voicing their concerns and lobbying for their positions. The decision on the bill now rests with the state Senate, where further discussions and negotiations are expected to take place.
Overall, the Summit carbon pipeline project has become a contentious issue in South Dakota, with landowners and the legislature at odds over the potential impact and use of eminent domain. The outcome of this debate will have far-reaching implications for the future of carbon transportation and storage in the state.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com